From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 21:29:57 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2011 02:29:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWIsv-0003K4-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWIst-0003Jx-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:56 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWIsh-00041A-46; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: wholenump versus natnump X-Spook: NORAD CID Downing Street AIEWS Commecen ARPA Mahmoud X-Ran: h_VQyBcZ)pi~RdEg?v.xN[*CR$<9 X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4zborr66zs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Package: emacs Severity: minor The Elisp manual says (since at least v21): @code{natnump} is an obsolete synonym for @code{wholenump}. However, the doc-string of natnump does not say anything about it being an (obsolete) alias for wholenump. wholenump is used a grand total of 7 times in the Emacs sources, whereas natnump is used ~ 100 times. Either natnump should be marked obsolete and replaced with wholenump, or the manual should be changed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 29 02:26:45 2012 Received: (at 10189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 07:26:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrP9x-0001Pp-75 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:26:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56001 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrP9u-0001Ph-LW for 10189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:26:43 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:46725 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrP9q-000795-Fm; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:26:39 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#10189: wholenump versus natnump References: <4zborr66zs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:26:31 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4zborr66zs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:43 -0500") Message-ID: <87wr8bj7fc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10189 Cc: 10189@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Glenn Morris writes: > Package: emacs > Severity: minor > > The Elisp manual says (since at least v21): > > @code{natnump} is an obsolete synonym for @code{wholenump}. > > However, the doc-string of natnump does not say anything about it being > an (obsolete) alias for wholenump. No point making it obsolete, anyway. I've clarified this in the manual, thanks for spotting it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 29 02:27:00 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 07:27:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrPAB-0001QE-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:27:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56003 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrPAA-0001Q8-Eo for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:26:58 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:46726 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrPA7-00079W-5z for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:26:55 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 10189 Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:26:45 +0800 Message-ID: <878vkr9dfu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 10189 thanks From unknown Mon Jun 23 13:15:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator