GNU bug report logs - #10182
Century bug in date utility?

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Krzysztof Kowalski <krzysztof7kowalski <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:11:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10182: closed (Century bug in date utility?)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:36:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:35:31 -0700
with message-id <4ED7BAE3.9070305 <at> redhat.com>
and subject line Re: bug#10182: Century bug in date utility?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10182,
regarding Century bug in date utility?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
10182: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10182
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Krzysztof Kowalski <krzysztof7kowalski <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Century bug in date utility?
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:34:09 +0100
Hello,

We have 2011,

HOWEVER:

korn% date +%C
20
korn% date
Thu Dec  1 16:26:30 CET 2011


apc%
apc% date +%C
20
apc%
apc% date
Thu Dec  1 16:26:51     2011

And many other call returns that we live in 20 century :)

For a test I changed system time to 1997 and date utility returned 20
century as well :)

-- 
best regards
  -- Kowalski Krzysztof



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kowalski <krzysztof7kowalski <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10182-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10182: Century bug in date utility?
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:35:31 -0700
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
tag 10182 notabug
thanks

On 12/01/2011 08:34 AM, Krzysztof Kowalski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have 2011,
> 
> HOWEVER:
> 
> korn% date +%C
> 20
> korn% date
> Thu Dec  1 16:26:30 CET 2011

Yep.  And this behavior is mandated by POSIX for strftime(), so it is
not a bug.

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/strftime.html

C
    Replaced by the year divided by 100 and truncated to an integer, as
a decimal number. [ tm_year]

That is, it is NOT the "century" in the vernacular (where years in the
range [2001,2100] are collectively called the 21st century), but the
first two digits of the year.  The idea is that you combine %C%y to form %Y.

> 
> For a test I changed system time to 1997 and date utility returned 20
> century as well :)

No, %C in 1997 returned 19.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 13 years and 176 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.