Subject: Re: bug#10147: HTTP "Expires" header should handle non-date values

From: Andy Wingo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:36:44 +0100

Hi Daniel,

Thanks very much for the thorough analysis!

On Tue 27 Dec 2011 16:49, Daniel Hartwig <[email-masked]> writes:

> Given those points, I have attached a patch implementing the suggested
> handling for "Expires" and will take a look at perhaps relaxing
> parse-date (and others).  Anyone have ideas on that?

I applied your patch, and I think some sensible parse-date relaxations
are a good idea too.

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/