From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:44:45 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10135 <10135@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10135 <10135@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Reply-To: bug#10135 <10135@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:44:45 +0000 retitle 10135 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (ag= ain) reassign 10135 emacs submitter 10135 "Drew Adams" severity 10135 wishlist tag 10135 wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 25 10:18:03 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2011 15:18:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxXP-0001aJ-K8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:18:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxXL-0001Zl-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:18:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxVh-0003IU-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:21 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:54818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxVh-0003IQ-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxVg-0002n1-KS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxVf-0003Hu-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:16 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:44894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTxVf-0003Hh-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:15 -0500 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pAPFGDBf015920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:16:14 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAPFGC9j013279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:16:12 GMT Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com [141.146.116.59]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAPFG6o7016325 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:16:07 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.44.13) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:16:06 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:16:09 -0800 Message-ID: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcyrhSjsu1ZLvEX0SLmVu6vTZrQoug== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4ECFB13E.0039,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) emacs -Q 1. Download hexrgb.el and oneonone.el: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/hexrgb.el http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/oneonone.el 2.runemacs.exe -Q --debug-init -l "hexrgb.el" -l "oneonone.el" -f "1on1-emacs" 3. (setq special-display-regexps '("[ ]?[*][^*]+[*]")) 4. C-h i 5. C-x 5 2 In step 4, a special-display frame is used, correctly (the buffer name matches `special-display-regexps'). In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same reason, but it is not. In GNU Emacs 24.0.91.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-11-21 on MARVIN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/include --ldflags -LD:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/lib' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 25 23:01:23 2011 Received: (at 10135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2011 04:01:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU9S7-0004P7-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:01:23 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU9S5-0004P1-4v for 10135@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:01:21 -0500 Received: from [12.206.98.253] (port=22327 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU9QS-0001AC-NK; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:59:40 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D3A96660D4; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:59:39 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Message-ID: References: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:59:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:16:09 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10135 Cc: 10135@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > 5. C-x 5 2 [...] > In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same > reason, but it is not. I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue, since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right? Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 26 09:56:32 2011 Received: (at 10135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2011 14:56:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUJg7-0003lm-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:56:31 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RUJg4-0003le-NA for 10135@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:56:29 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pAQEshKT028240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:54:44 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAQEsgho016412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:54:43 GMT Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAQEsbpw024082; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:54:37 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.44.65) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:54:37 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Stefan Monnier'" References: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> Subject: RE: bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:54:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: thread-index: Acyr79jQ+p6vj23OQfWN7QdFb3BquQAWwvlQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4ED0FDB4.00FF,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10135 Cc: 10135@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) > > 5. C-x 5 2 > > In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same > > reason, but it is not. > > I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue, > since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right? You are right, sir - my bad. Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as a wishlist item. Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', a special-display frame should be used. But you are correct that this bug is very old (at least as old as Emacs 20). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 28 11:01:37 2011 Received: (at 10135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2011 16:01:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV3eC-0005zT-4x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:01:36 -0500 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV3eA-0005zM-Dz for 10135@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:01:35 -0500 Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pASFxb8d026275; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:59:37 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1C02458D75; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:59:37 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Message-ID: References: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:59:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:54:26 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4055=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4055> : streams <705967> : uri <1017601> X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10135 Cc: 10135@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) >> > 5. C-x 5 2 >> > In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same >> > reason, but it is not. >> I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue, >> since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right? > You are right, sir - my bad. Thanks for confirming. > Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as > a wishlist item. The fact that it's not new doesn't change the fact that you dislike this behavior, so it's not a reason to close the bug. > Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', > a special-display frame should be used. As you know I use a similar setup to yours so I have gone through similar thoughts. I haven't actually tried to make C-x 5 2 "obey" special-display-regexps, but if someone wants to try it, here are some things to consider: - The default behavior for special-display-* is to reuse any window that already displays the buffer, so in order to make C-x 5 2 meaningful we'd clearly want to skip this part of the usual special-display-* behavior. - Maybe C-x 5 2 should be more like "clone frame" instead, i.e. don't pay attention to special-display-* but instead try to reproduce the existing frame (including dedicatedness of the window it displays). This opens the question of what to do when the selected frame has several windows, of course. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 28 11:26:36 2011 Received: (at 10135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2011 16:26:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV42N-0006ZC-FJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:26:36 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RV42K-0006Z4-Qz for 10135@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:26:33 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pASGOaxV000638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:24:37 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pASGOZLE009455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:24:35 GMT Received: from abhmt106.oracle.com (abhmt106.oracle.com [141.146.116.58]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pASGOT8e014452; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:24:29 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:24:29 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Stefan Monnier'" References: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> Subject: RE: bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:24:28 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Acyt5sJASVr9re9aQFWjctDdKxTZVQAAuNsg X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4ED3B5C5.007D,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10135 Cc: 10135@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) > > Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as > > a wishlist item. > > The fact that it's not new doesn't change the fact that you dislike > this behavior, so it's not a reason to close the bug. Thanks. > > Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', > > a special-display frame should be used. > > As you know I use a similar setup to yours so I have gone through > similar thoughts. I haven't actually tried to make C-x 5 2 "obey" > special-display-regexps, but if someone wants to try it, here are some > things to consider: > - The default behavior for special-display-* is to reuse any > window that already displays the buffer, so in order to make > C-x 5 2 meaningful we'd clearly want to skip this part of the > usual special-display-* behavior. But the only window that already displays the buffer is the _same_ window, and the purpose of C-x 5 2 is to open a new frame. Seems like the meaning of special-display would prescribe respecting `special-display-alist' whenever a special-display buffer is shown in a new frame. I guess I don't understand why any special treatment of "already displayed" would override that. > - Maybe C-x 5 2 should be more like "clone frame" instead, i.e. don't > pay attention to special-display-* but instead try to reproduce the > existing frame (including dedicatedness of the window it displays). > This opens the question of what to do when the selected frame has > several windows, of course. I would think that the only consideration would be the special-display-ness of the buffer to be displayed. If it is special-display, and if a new frame is being created for it, then I would think that that frame should respect `special-display-alist'. What am I missing? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 07 13:44:13 2021 Received: (at 10135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2021 17:44:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8n-0002cR-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:44:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8m-0002c7-27 for 10135@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:44:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oDqtHbEDuLamn24b1eCjepXBhAUga0fuffpXl3PGYts=; b=HeDvjUCowldFq3Mz8nBZGuk7rB QvjPqkPPZrGFWYnS7GdkHseeF6WH0Ymn/qpzT3PRiXx4q7IVXvJ0b2bLBG3djQsTUT/TLO2etwogr tW5+vTqKrLMGAEL7VvwkEGaIyFAOiEl+iknc88fqPwFSKAKlQnJLX4FApsWxLQDHr0mo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8c-0008Rq-FI; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:44:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Drew Adams" Subject: Re: bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) References: <5A0FD164923A4D9990DBFBA39F44FC52@us.oracle.com> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:44:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:54:26 -0800") Message-ID: <875yvcb7rx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: "Drew Adams" writes: > Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as a wishlist > item. > > Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', a special-display > frame should be used. Bu [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10135 Cc: 10135@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Stefan Monnier' X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "Drew Adams" writes: > Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as a wishlist > item. > > Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', a special-display > frame should be used. But you are correct that this bug is very old (at least > as old as Emacs 20). This is adjacent to bug#16767, I guess. But `special-display-regexps' is deprecated now, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 07 13:44:16 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2021 17:44:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8p-0002cj-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:44:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8o-0002cE-Gr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:44:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mjNlvpdO633SYmMaLc260ooRvLy0UHp8Pce2Entmo+A=; b=jTdOpRsjaAYoaYK6ovVm9SqsEP CzD/aAezUfGNE+bpfhDzcZRcvE+bRV4h2sPld7eyPtJLudwj1kq+hROnLyppe6N06GFR09npc4zhV 2TwJvC87y2vTvY3crf/nqjU9gI+XVZR4+EOw7W/QryDKyHF0AZjwWQr0004YhSn9SwgA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNf8h-0008Rz-1o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:44:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 19:44:06 +0200 Message-Id: <874kawb7rt.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10135 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 10135 wontfix close 10135 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 10135 wontfix close 10135 quit From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:44:45 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator