GNU bug report logs -
#10125
24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order of byte compilation
Previous Next
Full log
Message #71 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Stefan Monnier writes:
>>> I guess we could fork Emacs early on and keep this second process
>>> around as a "process from which to generate new clean slates".
>> I've been thinking about something like this for a while… if it worked
>> at least as well as starting a new Emacs instance on all platforms, I'd
>> favor this approach.
>
> IIUC "fork" is not really an option for w32.
For the intended application spawn should work as well?
> Yes, this subroutine is never directly called from C, so placing an
> advice should work just fine.
OK, I'll give it a try.
>> As long as the package is properly namespaced, why not allow for
>> removing all definitions pertaining to that entire namespace (features,
>> autoloads, definitions, …)?
>
> We could try that, as well, but it would only work for those packages
> that are "properly namespaced" (and there's no way to detect that
> AFAIK).
True, but a package might indicate if it is "one of those" and get the
appropriate treatment from package manager.
> Along the same lines, we could try to use unload-feature.
I thought this was potentially dangerous, but reading the docstring
again maybe not. Let me try that as well.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 304 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.