From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Mark Lillibridge Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10078@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Reply-To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132173754611891 (code B ref -1); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:20:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2011 21:19:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsJW-00035k-LZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:19:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsJT-00035b-Ff for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:19:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsIO-0003eg-Qg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:59 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:49918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsIO-0003eW-PF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsIM-0003oJ-To for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsIL-0003eC-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:54 -0500 Received: from madara.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:54293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RRsIL-0003ds-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:53 -0500 Received: from masterns.hpl.hp.com (masterns.hpl.hp.com [15.0.48.4]) by madara.hpl.hp.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id pAJLHocZ005412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:17:50 -0800 Received: from MDL ([16.213.66.251]) by masterns.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id pAJLHkBQ028025; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:17:47 -0800 From: Mark Lillibridge Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:17:33 -0800 Message-ID: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 15.0.152.124 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) This is probably more of a command fails to do the expected and useful thing rather than strictly a bug. The help documentation for this command is as follows: v runs the command rmail-mime, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `rmailmm.el'. It is bound to v. (rmail-mime &optional ARG) Toggle displaying of a MIME message. The actualy behavior depends on the value of `rmail-enable-mime'. If `rmail-enable-mime' is t (default), this command change the displaying of a MIME message between decoded presentation form and raw data. With ARG, toggle the displaying of the current MIME entity only. If `rmail-enable-mime' is nil, this creates a temporary "*RMAIL*" buffer holding a decoded copy of the message. Inline content-types are handled according to `rmail-mime-media-type-handlers-alist'. By default, this displays text and multipart messages, and offers to download attachments as specfied by `rmail-mime-attachment-dirs-alist'. From "displaying of a MIME message between decoded presentation form and raw data", I would assume this command would toggle between the normal display of a message and it's raw undecoded form. What it actually does is a very weird hybrid where you get raw data for the parts but the boundaries are still decoded (e.g., missing). An example probably helps here. Consider the following message as it is normally presented: Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:02:35 -0800 Subject: this message has a text and HTML part From: Mark Lillibridge To: mdl@alum.mit.edu [1:text/plain Hide] *this *is bold. [2:text/html Show] When you hit 'v', this switches to (I've replaced a lot of headers with ...): >From mdl Sat Nov 19 13:03:52 2011 Return-Path: Received: from pobox-pa.hpl.hp.com [15.25.112.25] by ts-rhel5 with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.6) for (single-drop); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:03:52 -0800 (PST) ... MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: this message has a text and HTML part From: Mark Lillibridge To: mdl@alum.mit.edu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53aec3ee5f3fe04b21cc50d ... X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -------- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 *this *is bold. Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 this is bold.

For comparison, the actual raw message body looks like: --bcaec53aec3ee5f3fe04b21cc50d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 *this *is bold. --bcaec53aec3ee5f3fe04b21cc50d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 this is bold.

--bcaec53aec3ee5f3fe04b21cc50d-- I can't for the life of me figure out what the hybrid version is useful for. It's very hard to tell where the different parts begin and end. This command can individually toggle parts to showing raw decoding via C-u v; for example, here's what it looks like with only the second part decoded: Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:02:35 -0800 Subject: this message has a text and HTML part From: Mark Lillibridge To: mdl@alum.mit.edu [1:text/plain Hide] *this *is bold. Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 this is bold.

I don't understand why this is useful either. Can someone please explain why either of these abilities are useful? I know do want the the show raw message command from to time to time and that is what the help message seems to promise so I'd recommend replacing the current 'v' functionality (with rmail-enable-mime t) with a simple toggle to show raw message command. This would have the advantage of also being symmetrical with the rmail-enable-mime nil case. - Mark From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Cc: 10078@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132176129517751 (code B ref 10078); Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2011 03:54:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRyUY-0004cG-S1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:54:54 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRyUW-0004c6-UM for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:54:54 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LUX00G00WQX2W00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:53:45 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.237.133]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LUX00FY2XHKXE50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:53:45 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:51:56 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Mark Lillibridge > Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:17:33 -0800 > > I can't for the life of me figure out what the hybrid version is > useful for. It is mainly useful for MIME messages with attachments. From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132209956122119 (code B ref 10078); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 01:52:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTOUQ-0005kg-UN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:52:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTOUK-0005kT-VI for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:52:33 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTOSt-0004jG-1n; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:51:03 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Peking Abbas Compsec AGT. AMME Pine Gap world domination X-Ran: w^!8{d}8TgFp^gZh|e4whTThUSN.=I,KZ'0|]`?;zo3WsH4+&[2/,"9>,]-n6",7>FK>C" X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:51:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:51:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I can't for the life of me figure out what the hybrid version is >> useful for. > > It is mainly useful for MIME messages with attachments. I don't get it. In "raw" form, an attachment is hundreds or thousands of lines of gobbledygook, whereas a mime boundary is a line or so of somewhat readable text. How is it useful to show the former but hide the latter? Especially since the various Content-Type headers are shown. There definitely needs to be _some_ command that completely undoes what rmail-mime does to a message. Then rmailedit could use it instead of the hack it uses now (bug#9840). If not rmail-mime, then `rmail-unmime' or somesuch. From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.13221073162558 (code B ref 10078); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 04:01:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTQVY-0000fC-5B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:01:56 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTQVU-0000f3-H7 for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:01:53 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LV500C00CGKHB00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:00:22 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.247]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LV500C0NCGLH210@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:00:22 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:00:23 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: mark.lillibridge@hp.com, 10078@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:51:02 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> I can't for the life of me figure out what the hybrid version is > >> useful for. > > > > It is mainly useful for MIME messages with attachments. > > I don't get it. In "raw" form, an attachment is hundreds or thousands of > lines of gobbledygook, whereas a mime boundary is a line or so of > somewhat readable text. How is it useful to show the former but hide the > latter? Especially since the various Content-Type headers are shown. FWIW, I have nothing against showing the MIME boundary as well. From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132215965519145 (code B ref 10078); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 18:34:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTe7j-0004yk-7K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:34:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTe7g-0004yc-FR for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:34:13 -0500 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTe60-0007Xu-Az; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:28 -0500 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Richard Stallman In-reply-to: <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:00:23 +0200) References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) FWIW, I have nothing against showing the MIME boundary as well. I thought of trying to make it show that, but I couldn't understand the code very well, and could not do it. Then I saw that displaying the code exactly as it appears in the file achieved the same goal and was easy. So I did it that way. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/ From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: rms@gnu.org Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132216082020945 (code B ref 10078); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 18:53:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeQV-0005Rm-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:53:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeQU-0005Rg-PA for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:53:39 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeOy-0000aY-Mj; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:04 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: MIT-LL 2600 Magazine Armani unclassified UNSCOM Europol X-Ran: V[\>${!0M1{EmRfBT%[i@jt7'z:Z.nA3/)ZJX;0py;.<#0;;Z660u={=y+MCQsu8Se.XA* X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:28 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Richard Stallman wrote: > FWIW, I have nothing against showing the MIME boundary as well. > > I thought of trying to make it show that, but I couldn't understand > the code very well, and could not do it. Me neither... > Then I saw that displaying the code exactly as it appears in the > file achieved the same goal and was easy. So I did it that way. What function are you referring to here? How do you "displaying the code exactly as it appears in the file"? From unknown Sun Jun 22 20:59:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132223983114286 (code B ref 10078); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:51:01 +0000 Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2011 16:50:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyyt-0003iN-C9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:50:31 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyyq-0003iF-KC for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:50:29 -0500 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTyxF-00062a-KR; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:48:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:48:49 -0500 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Richard Stallman In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:04 -0500) References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) What function are you referring to here? How do you "displaying the code exactly as it appears in the file"? Sorry, I mean display it without mime processing. I don't remember which function it was, but ChangeLog should show. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 29 12:49:59 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2012 16:49:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6lSo-0006vP-MM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:49:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36645) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6lSn-0006vJ-20 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:49:57 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6lRj-0005Tu-RJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:48:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:48:51 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 12305 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -7.1 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -7.1 (-------) forcemerge 10078 12305