GNU bug report logs - #10016
ls -lk is wrong

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: "Alan Curry" <pacman-cu <at> kosh.dhis.org>

Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:04:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #29 received at 10016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 10016 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>,
	Alan Curry <pacman-cu <at> kosh.dhis.org>
Subject: Re: bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:25:40 -0800

On 11/11/2011 10:36 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Are you proposing that --block-size keep the current behavior, and that
> -k no longer be a synonym for --block-size=1k but instead becomes a new
> long option?
>
> Makes sense to me

That sort of thing makes sense to me too.
I assume --block-size should silently override -k
if both options are specified (in either order)?
Does -k need a long-named option?
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 254 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.