From unknown Sat Sep 06 20:53:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10003: DF command Resent-From: Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10003 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10003@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132085820613245 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:04:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2011 17:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROBYa-0003RX-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:03:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44Y-0007wW-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44O-0000W8-25 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:47464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44O-0000W4-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44J-0006IW-L4 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44I-0000VB-7y for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:39 -0500 Received: from c2bthomr07.btconnect.com ([213.123.20.125]:24874 helo=mail.btconnect.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44H-0000SU-3z for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:38 -0500 Received: from host217-34-45-119.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO sentry) ([217.34.45.119]) by c2bthomr07.btconnect.com with ESMTP id FFN14873; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:01:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:01:07 -0000 Message-ID: <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acyevh3ogfrIRrYEQF6cwXWBizS68Q== Content-Language: en-gb X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0303.4EBA4179.0095, actions=TAG X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.7.19.51514:17:8.317, ip=217.34.45.119, rules=NO_REAL_NAME, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_MAILER, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __CP_AGE_BODY, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_6000_6999, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_70_90, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_FOUND X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr07.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.4EBA41E7.0159,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:03:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi I have a server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc's has worked well. Yesterday ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete files. However trash would not clear under gui so used command line which worked a treat. When i look at the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb with 144gb free which sounds correct as I've deleted loads, but when I type in on command line df-h or df -k it shows the disk 100% used. Is there a neat way to get the df to recalculate Look forward to hearing from you, all help appreciated. Regards Steve Hewett ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DF command

Hi

I have a = server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc’s has worked = well.

Yesterday = ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete = files.

However trash would not clear under gui so used = command line which worked a = treat.

When i look at = the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb = with = 144gb free which sounds correct as I’ve = deleted loads, but when I = type in on command = line df-h or df –k = it shows the disk 100% used.

Is there a = neat way to = get the df to recalculate

Look = forward to hearing from you, all help = appreciated.

Regards

Steve = Hewett

------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510-- From unknown Sat Sep 06 20:53:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10003: DF command Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10003 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: hs4@btconnect.com Cc: 10003@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10003-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10003.132086171318625 (code B ref 10003); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 10003) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2011 18:01:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROCTA-0004qM-Rc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:01:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROCT8-0004qE-0I for 10003@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:01:51 -0500 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA9I1gbU013754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:01:42 -0500 Received: from [10.36.116.57] (ovpn-116-57.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.57]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA9I1ddH008357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:01:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4EBAC003.7030602@draigBrady.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:01:39 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> In-Reply-To: <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx1.redhat.com id pA9I1gbU013754 X-Spam-Score: -10.5 (----------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.5 (----------) On 11/09/2011 09:01 AM, hs4@btconnect.com wrote: > Hi > I have a server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc's has > worked well. > Yesterday ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete files. > However trash would not clear under gui so used command line which work= ed a > treat. > When i look at the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb with 144gb fre= e > which sounds correct as I've deleted loads, but when I type in on comma= nd > line df-h or df -k it shows the disk 100% used. > Is there a neat way to get the df to recalculate > Look forward to hearing from you, all help appreciated. df just reports what the file system says. Is this a remote file system, nfs, cifs etc? If you could give the output of `df -Th` it would be informative. I very much doubt a bug in df though. cheers, P=E1draig. From unknown Sat Sep 06 20:53:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10003: DF command Resent-From: Jim Meyering Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10003 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: hs4@btconnect.com Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady , 10003@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10003-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10003.13217184062081 (code B ref 10003); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 10003) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2011 16:00:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRnKn-0000Wj-TC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:00:06 -0500 Received: from mx.meyering.net ([88.168.87.75]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRnKm-0000US-UJ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:00:05 -0500 Received: from rho.meyering.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rho.meyering.net (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 0D457600D7; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:59:01 +0100 (CET) From: Jim Meyering In-Reply-To: <4EBAC003.7030602@draigBrady.com> ("=?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A1draig?= Brady"'s message of "Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:01:39 +0000") References: <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> <4EBAC003.7030602@draigBrady.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:59:00 +0100 Message-ID: <877h2wje7v.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Lines: 26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) tags 10003 + moreinfo thanks P=E1draig Brady wrote: > On 11/09/2011 09:01 AM, hs4@btconnect.com wrote: >> Hi >> I have a server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc's has >> worked well. >> Yesterday ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete files. >> However trash would not clear under gui so used command line which worke= d a >> treat. >> When i look at the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb with 144gb free >> which sounds correct as I've deleted loads, but when I type in on command >> line df-h or df -k it shows the disk 100% used. >> Is there a neat way to get the df to recalculate >> Look forward to hearing from you, all help appreciated. > > df just reports what the file system says. > Is this a remote file system, nfs, cifs etc? > If you could give the output of `df -Th` > it would be informative. > > I very much doubt a bug in df though. I've marked this bug report "moreinfo", meaning that we are requesting you provide "more information". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 30 04:07:08 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2012 08:07:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6zmO-0004un-2q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:07:08 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6zmL-0004uf-2I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:07:06 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED43A20DA5 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:05:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:05:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=g3x1YkP2vluBEiAMNfVG/RrTs8w=; b=TZifXzPLwB25W+uO3zOoS/hKp7Oe KhJauDa80k+NMovM0kYUSZt+0p/bpnOh0CKI1A233+hxUgr8wXVw3M1yaiA+SIjp 3lcXH7H2asp6p+g+dl6KDunycJuQGMWel+95+AZrDypuVZfWuzQ8lk/q3aAG3yXQ TT9u7m6/S5244xc= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id BD7B04C0212; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:05:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1346313955.6848.140661121418585.20DF5764@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: T2AqFlIWN6GQ1vxU9Q18H9U0y8luevpcLNcOSgz5PZxR 1346313955 From: era eriksson To: control@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Bug maintenance Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:05:55 +0300 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) forcemerge 6366 10924 merge 7389 7394 tags 7394 + patch merge 7948 7963 7968 retitle 9140 [du] broken on OSX 10.7 (Lion) for >4TB file systems retitle 10003 [df] information differs from GUI retitle 10013 [ls] document origin of name tags 10013 + patch retitle 10054 [cp] 8.13: cp -au may replace newer files [sr #107876] retitle 10877 [sort] too eager to use temp files retitle 11760 [mv] data loss after ctrl-C on ntfs -> ntfs move thanks I also wanted to retitle 10900 but it's too opaque, and should be followed up. I took this out because I'm not sure I was able to summarize it correctly. retitle 10639 [cp] test-copy-acl fails on Solaris 64bit + NFS /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. From unknown Sat Sep 06 20:53:51 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Subject: bug#10003: closed (Close) Message-ID: References: <5201CE3B.7000805@gmail.com> <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 10003 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Reply-To: 10003@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 04:35:04 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1375850104-30636-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1375850104-30636-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #10003: [df] information differs from GUI which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 10003@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 10003: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D10003 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1375850104-30636-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 10003-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2013 04:34:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vRy-0007w2-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:34:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com ([209.85.128.53]:56855) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vRq-0007vc-PG for 10003-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:34:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f6so733732qej.12 for <10003-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:34:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=abVPogtEQ6xbnjYSRBeG+CUlcUvRS4Wch/bQ1uC5/X0=; b=p4sgAhdrwdDv1mTEzmw+OGPDM23JoC7mU9wvIIGovqIb9T/FV03VclduQH3+gX5p4c nPvBa3ViRlVLF5viv/OM2DKHBcEk+iWdkoU3i0NPlAOEnvSTv1L3PBtb9LTizab7fLXz gIyLJOG910rA2oaEL+aBJm40zHc/cbrJv3crLFUkYoZ/Jj4QyjCEVvPxQcukefQ40btu S5UiI5bjzazHA7eT9VpY30pdDgojBbwYfEAAcNfL1piK7H25p4h62IIexHj9T7fI5txu 9+Bt8rFYTVMl6Qf23+MpjLJvVNPLCQBjmZswbavK1RUR1mJQ1yQCs+ebe0LdHGhdlRnS y+Tg== X-Received: by 10.224.126.129 with SMTP id c1mr2431603qas.93.1375850045092; Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (modemcable156.191-56-74.mc.videotron.ca. [74.56.191.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm6967255qej.4.2013.08.06.21.34.03 for <10003-close@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5201CE3B.7000805@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:34:03 -0400 From: Filipus Klutiero User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 10003-close@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Close Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10003-close X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) This report lacks information allowing to solve the problem, which was requested a good while ago. If you still experience this issue and can provide the necessary information, feel free to reopen this ticket and do so. ------------=_1375850104-30636-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2011 17:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROBYa-0003RX-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:03:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44Y-0007wW-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44O-0000W8-25 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:47464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44O-0000W4-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44J-0006IW-L4 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44I-0000VB-7y for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:39 -0500 Received: from c2bthomr07.btconnect.com ([213.123.20.125]:24874 helo=mail.btconnect.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RO44H-0000SU-3z for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:03:38 -0500 Received: from host217-34-45-119.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO sentry) ([217.34.45.119]) by c2bthomr07.btconnect.com with ESMTP id FFN14873; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:01:46 +0000 (GMT) From: To: Subject: DF command Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:01:07 -0000 Message-ID: <002801cc9ebe$1e55b510$5b011f30$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acyevh3ogfrIRrYEQF6cwXWBizS68Q== Content-Language: en-gb X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0303.4EBA4179.0095, actions=TAG X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.7.19.51514:17:8.317, ip=217.34.45.119, rules=NO_REAL_NAME, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_MAILER, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __CP_AGE_BODY, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_6000_6999, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_70_90, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_FOUND X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr07.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.4EBA41E7.0159,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:03:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi I have a server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc's has worked well. Yesterday ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete files. However trash would not clear under gui so used command line which worked a treat. When i look at the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb with 144gb free which sounds correct as I've deleted loads, but when I type in on command line df-h or df -k it shows the disk 100% used. Is there a neat way to get the df to recalculate Look forward to hearing from you, all help appreciated. Regards Steve Hewett ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DF command

Hi

I have a = server some 3 years old acting as a backup for my two pc’s has worked = well.

Yesterday = ran out of disk space and used the gui option to delete = files.

However trash would not clear under gui so used = command line which worked a = treat.

When i look at = the gui in Trash it shows disk size 250gb = with = 144gb free which sounds correct as I’ve = deleted loads, but when I = type in on command = line df-h or df –k = it shows the disk 100% used.

Is there a = neat way to = get the df to recalculate

Look = forward to hearing from you, all help = appreciated.

Regards

Steve = Hewett

------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC9EBE.1E55B510-- ------------=_1375850104-30636-1--