On 04/02/2013 11:30 AM, Rémy Lefevre wrote:
> I'm not sure to understand your first sentence. Resolving the last component is already the existing behavior, but maybe not the intended one.
> 
> Anyway, I agree that the path should be resolved without its last component.
> 
> I wrote a new patch for this. I hope that this one will not break anything.

It looks good.

I've attached the full patch in your name with a test and NEWS entry.
Also attached is a related doc change, detailing the symlink
resolution done with ln --relative.

thanks!
Pádraig.