The master-X versions are for gc-cons-percentage = X.  wgc is a branch
with a half finished Whipped GC.

>> For latency, we have no benchmarks; so I'm not convinced that igc
>> actually has lower latency.
>
> My anecdotal evidence from running the igc branch is unambiguous: it
> is significantly less "stuttering" than the master branch.

Is that with gc-cons-percentage = 0.1?

>> Even if igc has lower latency, the current way igc triggers
>> opportunistic GC doesn't work well: I've often seen "Opportunism: client
>> predicts plenty of idle time, so start full collection." messages when I
>> was about to type something.
>
> So maybe some tuning is in order?

Definitely.

Helmut

[*] https://github.com/ellerh/igc-benchmarks