Jim Meyering wrote:
> The first one is a clear bug fix.

Oops, my bad. Thanks for catching that. I installed a simpler fix (first 
attached patch).

> For the second, since --no-time (-T) never worked (-m does),
> I could also just remove its entry from longopts. We've
> done without it for so long, there's little point to adding
> an undocumented --no-time, now.

Thanks, I like that idea and installed the 2nd attached patch.

In rereading the code I noticed other problems likely to bite after the year 
2038 (3rd attached patch, also installed). This stuff is a pain, as it won't see 
realistic testing for another 20 years or so and I don't see easy test cases for 
it, partly because GNU/Linux seems to mishandles these time stamps now on my 
platform (Fedora 24 x86-64; I'll try to file a bug report about this to Fedora).

Boldly marking the bug as done.