> Cc: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>,
> Kristoffer Balintona <krisbalintona@gmail.com>,
> Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>, 79009@debbugs.gnu.org,
> Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>, Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>,
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>,
> ijqq@protonmail.com
> From: sbaugh@catern.com
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
>
> > My patch is self consistent as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Once we decide on if we leave equal semantics to the caller, for example, vtable-goto-object call site first locating an object on
> > its own, then relying on eq semantics to move point, or allow users to define -object-equal, the rest of my related changes
> > (coming shortly after we conclude this part of the discussion) have more cache items repaired, not just these.
> >
> > We can debate simplifying the cache in a new cache-related patch, yes?
>
> Sure. If we debate it in a new patch, then don't change the cache in
> this patch. If you want to change the cache in this patch, then we have
> to debate it now.
Can we please have an updated patch that we could discuss and perhaps
install?
I think the ball is in my court. I've been on holiday (but obv reading email) and will get back to this soon.