[செவ்வாய் ஜூலை 15, 2025] Stéphane Marks wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 3:54 PM Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com> wrote:
>
>> Stéphane Marks <shipmints@gmail.com> writes:
>> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 2:16 PM Stéphane Marks <shipmints@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've updated the broader vtable update in the referenced 78843 bug to
>> check out if interested.
>> >
>> > I've removed support for the duplicate-object feature.  After careful
>> consideration, it was half baked and I think better for vtable
>> > programmers to handle their own objects.  I will be sure the
>> documentation stresses to avoid duplicate objects as vtable's design is
>> > predicated on unique objects (or race conditions ensue among duplicate
>> object references).
>>
>> Thank you, this was going to be my first bit of feedback.
>>
>> Folowup question: What is the motivation for adding customizable object
>> equality?  Could the need for that be avoided by some changes specific
>> to vtable-update-object?
>>
>
> It's really a policy question and future proofing.  I believe Lars
> originated this idea and probably has use cases for this in his vtable code.

This question came up in emacs-devel once before: https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/CANVbq5kjPpCKwMBSYfHHLMFXAX7vAgy+D=uLAwJoTGQ5cLSjFQ@mail.gmail.com