On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 9:56 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:
On 05/03/2025 20:51, Ship Mints wrote:
> Right.  We did discuss this a bit back then.  Which of these two less
> heavy-handed approaches do you prefer?  Setting the property to nil or
> removing it?

Removing it, I guess. But the function should still be accessed through
an indirection, so it should be called project-vc-* as it's specific to
project-vc.

Agree. Done in the attached patch.

-Stephane