Thanks for the quick response!
Btw. you reference commit 354150c in your patch but then build from a
different commit. Perhaps you could use that single commit as a patch
instead?
I like that better, I've updated the patch to instead apply the patch for that commit instead along with a note to drop the patch when the next version of eglot-x is released.
Yes, please use git-version.
And for anyone else using random commits while coding version without
it, let this be a reminder to use git-version.
Given that now we are using the commit for version 0.6 (which doesn't have a tag) there is no need to to use git-version. t was only in the case that we started shipping an unreleased commit as the version, correct?
--
"I object to doing things that computers can do." — Olin Shivers