Yes, they got separated bug IDs, next time I should probably consider modifying the patch headers so that they are sent in reply to the cover letter.

The first patch has been merged (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59992).
The second has been divided in 2:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59993#23
and
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60962 (I replied to the wrong message when sending the v3)

Fred.




On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:29 PM Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> wrote:
    However, neither in this mail, nor in your original did I find a
    corresponding patch.

Hi Jim - they ended up with separate bug#s, since separate emails.
At least I think these are those:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59992 (applied by mike?)
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59993

BTW, see also the next bug,
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59994
for more from Frederic, about flex madness.

karl