Pádraig,

Thank you for your response

Unfortunately, even the command pattern you are proposing as an alternative:

  [[:space:]]\{1,\}CDS[[:space:]]\{1,\}

does not work, therefore I have to conclude that csplit is neither BRE and ERE compatible

Thanks for your help

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:23 PM Pádraig Brady <P@draigbrady.com> wrote:

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

On 12/11/2021 17:05, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote:
> Dear Coreutils Maintainers,
> 
> First, thank you for your work. I use coreutils daily both for my research
> and teaching. It is a great set of tools.
> 
> Second, I recently needed to extract Coding Sequences information from a
> GenBank file. GenBank files are used in Computational
> Genomics/Bioinformatics extensively. I used csplit, and it works like a
> charm.
> 
> The command I used is:
> 
> csplit -sz -n 5 --prefix=02_ 01_00001
> /[[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]]CDS[[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]][[:space:]]/
> {*};
> 
> I was unable to declare: "[[:space:]]\+" as I expected for POSIX aware code.
> 
> My question is: Is csplit POSIX compatible? and if it is not, can we make
> it POSIX compatible?


Well POSIX defines BRE and ERE, with csplit supporting the former.
 From the code we have:

   re_syntax_options =
     RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC & ~RE_CONTEXT_INVALID_DUP & ~RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES;

Generally one can replace '+' functionality from ERE, with '\{1,\}' in BRE.
So you'd be using something like:

   [[:space:]]\{1,\}CDS[[:space:]]\{1,\}

We might add an option to use ERE, though there isn't a big need
for that I think for csplit use cases.

cheers,
Pádraig