Yes, I agree (with myself :-). I've just "cleaned the room" according to your instructions and I still see the desired behavior.

So I guess this wraps up the issue. Thanks for all the help.

João

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:03 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Cc: 32986@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:08:30 +0100
>
> In other words, subprocess input is considered during a 'sit-for'. It
> doesn't end it, but that's OK if catch/throw is used.
>
> I'd just like to confirm that I'm not dealing with an "dirty room"
> situation here, to use your metaphor.

I think you are right.