Hi Assaf,

Thanks for the explanation.

But if I put 'i' command before 'd' command, shouldn't the input new lines be deleted ? Since new inputed lines contain the pattern 'd' command want.

Br,
Xingming

2017-06-14 22:58 GMT+08:00 Assaf Gordon <assafgordon@gmail.com>:
tag 27354 notabug
thanks

Hello,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:48:41AM +0800, Han Lu wrote:
[...]
The below command works as expected.
~$ sed -e 's/127.0.0.1/127/' -e "1i 127.0.0.1 localhost\n127.0.0.1
[...]
But command below is not working as expeced:
~$ sed -e '/127.0.0.1/d' -e "1i 127.0.0.1 localhost\n127.0.0.1

First,
thank you for providing such clear information on how to
reproduce your output - it makes troubleshooting much easier.

This is not a bug in sed, but a side-effect of the 'd' (=delete)
command: when sed executes the 'd' command, it immediately starts
a new cycle (i.e. skips all other commands, reads the next line of the input, and starts from the first sed command).

In your example, the sequence is:
1. sed reads the first input line (it contains '127.0.0.1')
2. the 'd' command is executed - line is deleted and not printed,
  and sed restarts a new cycle:
  it skips all other commands and reads the next input line.
4. The first time the '1i' command is executed, sed is already
  on the second input line, and the address '1' is never matched -
  the command is never executed.

This also explains why it does work when you add a dummy comment line:
The '/127.0.0.1/d' does not match the first line,
and then the '1i' command is matched and executed.

A simple work-around would be to put the 'i' command
before the 'd' command, like so:

   sed -e '1i 127.0.0.1 ....' -e '/127/d'

As such, I'm marking this as 'not a bug',
but discussion can continue by replying to this thread.

regards,
- assaf