On 25/07/11 17:26, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Actually I'm wondering now whether the new code
> should be unconditionally replacing the dest?
> What if the dest is a separate newer file?
> I.E. I think the following amended test should pass?
> Also what about backups if the separate file is older?

Well backups take a different path, as do
older or non existing destination paths.
So how about this change to just remove
the new create_hard_link: call and beef up the test?

cheers,
Pádraig.