Hello,

On Mon 01 Sep 2025 at 11:45am -04, Stefan Monnier wrote:

>>> How 'bout we just prompt for all `file-error`s?  After all, the same
>>> kind of reasoning applies to invalid .gz files, or files for which we
>>> don't have read access, ...
>> I realised after trying out my patch a bit that the prompting is a bit
>> annoying.  It's common to interrupt and then restart 'C-x p r'
>> operations but that means you get prompted over and over again for the
>> same files.
>> How about converting `file-error's into warnings?
>
> Fine by me (probably better if they're batched).

delay-warning seems to be sufficient to batch them up.
Let me know what you think of this.

-- 
Sean Whitton