Bruno Haible writes: >> + /* Work around glibc bug 33245 > > It would be good to document the workaround in > doc/glibc-functions/copy_file_range.texi. Yep, I noticed as well. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding the versions before doing it myself. Done with the attached patch now. > Collin Funk wrote: >> Can't we make this condition only occur for glibc 2.41 and glibc 2.42? >> The issue shouldn't occur before commit >> 89b53077d2a58f00e7debdfe58afabe953dac60d in glibc (2024-06-25). > > Users are supposed to be able to create binaries with an older version of > glibc, then upgrade their glibc. The binaries should continue to work. Right. I seemed to have forgot that every program isn't statically linked to glibc... Thanks. Collin