kobarity wrote:
> 
> Liu Hui wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Aug 3, 2025 at 7:47 PM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Liu Hui <liuhui1610@gmail.com>
> > > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:45:54 +0800
> > > > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, michael.albinus@gmx.de, 79036@debbugs.gnu.org
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:08 PM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > For non-file buffers, could it return buffer name instead of <string>?
> > > > > > > e.g. #<buffer NAME> or #<NAME> where NAME may need to be quoted. Then
> > > > > > > python-pdbtrack-set-tracked-buffer can find it by (get-buffer-create
> > > > > > > "NAME").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That might be a good idea.  Why is `get-buffer-create' is necessary
> > > > > > rather than `get-buffer'?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for pointing it out. get-buffer should be used here.
> > > >
> > > > So can we please have an updated patch for this?
> > >
> > > Since it is an improvement to add a new feature and not a fix for
> > > #79036, I think it would be better to separate the patches.
> > >
> > > Attached is my proposed patch to fix #79036.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I find python-shell-send-file has the same issue as
> > python-shell-send-string, and
> > needs to use correct file-name too.
> 
> Thanks, I will update the patch.

Attached is the revised patch to fix #79036.