On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 6:36 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Stéphane Marks > > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 10:22:15 -0400 > > Cc: sbaugh@catern.com, sbaugh@janestreet.com, krisbalintona@gmail.com, > > joostkremers@fastmail.fm, 79009@debbugs.gnu.org, > visuweshm@gmail.com, > > adam@alphapapa.net, larsi@gnus.org, arstoffel@gmail.com, > ijqq@protonmail.com > > > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 9:47 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > Cc: Spencer Baugh , > > > Kristoffer Balintona , > > > Joost Kremers , 79009@debbugs.gnu.org, > > > Visuwesh , Adam Porter , > > > Lars Ingebrigtsen , Augusto Stoffel < > arstoffel@gmail.com>, > > > ijqq@protonmail.com > > > From: sbaugh@catern.com > > > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC) > > > > > > > My patch is self consistent as far as I can tell. > > > > > > > > Once we decide on if we leave equal semantics to the caller, for > example, vtable-goto-object call > > site first locating an object on > > > > its own, then relying on eq semantics to move point, or allow users > to define -object-equal, the rest > > of my related changes > > > > (coming shortly after we conclude this part of the discussion) have > more cache items repaired, not > > just these. > > > > > > > > We can debate simplifying the cache in a new cache-related patch, > yes? > > > > > > Sure. If we debate it in a new patch, then don't change the cache in > > > this patch. If you want to change the cache in this patch, then we > have > > > to debate it now. > > > > Can we please have an updated patch that we could discuss and perhaps > > install? > > > > I think the ball is in my court. I've been on holiday (but obv reading > email) and will get back to this soon. > > Any progress since then? > Still traveling. Once I return to "normal" I'll start attacking the vtable list in digestible chunks with the group. Don't worry--I won't forget this project, I spent far too much time fixing vtable bugs and adding missing features to let this go (plus, I volunteered to be the vtable maintainer, right?).