On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 5:42 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Stéphane Marks > > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:12:46 -0400 > > Cc: 78843@debbugs.gnu.org, adam@alphapapa.net, sbaugh@janestreet.com, > > larsi@gnus.org, arstoffel@gmail.com, krisbalintona@gmail.com > > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 4:59 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Is it really not feasible to have separate patches for each bugfix and > > each enhancement (or coherent set of enhancements)? What if we decide > > to install just some of these changes -- you'd need to update the > > entire large patch, instead of dropping a relatively small one and > > leaving the others intact. > > > > I hope we elect to adopt them all. It would be much more work to tease > them all out piecemeal and wouldn't > > really, in the end, produce a better vtable. > > Please also consider the inherent difficulties in reviewing such a > large (4K lines!) patch. > Let's start with the vtable users I looped in actually using it. I can attach a vtable.el without the patch file and make it easier. > WRT quoting symbols, there are examples in the texinfo doc collection > that suggest the convention is not > > enforced: > > They are all bugs that need to be fixed. Patches welcome. "Not > enforced" would be a wrong conclusion from these omissions. > Cool. I have a patch or two to ediff coming and ediff doesn't follow ELisp formatting conventions which I found confusing.