Thank you.

On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 13:45, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> [Please use Reply All" to reply, so as to keep the bug tracker CC'ed.]
>
> > From: John Holman <john.g.holman@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 13:38:49 +0100
> >
> > Many thanks for the fast response. I do think that's a surprising
> feature and that most users would expect
> > "\u00B2" to be interpreted as a unicode character especially given the
> \u representation, which I think is
> > specific to Unicode even if treated as just a variant numerical
> representation in emacs. Would it make sense
> > for emacs to take the \u format into account when interpreting that
> string?
>
> I don't think this is feasible, since by the time the character is
> interpreted the information that it came from a "\uNNN" format is long
> gone.  But maybe Stefan (CC'ed) will have some ideas.
>