On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:34 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Ship Mints <shipmints@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:34:07 -0400
> > Cc: 77945@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> >  >  Doesn't describe-face already satisfy that need?
> >  >
> >  > I wanted a programmatic API where I could "diff" output.
> >
> >  Sorry, I don't understand.  describe-face produces a buffer that can
> >  be diff'ed, right?
> >
> > I meant "diff" (hence my use of quotes) in the compare two lists
> programmatically sense.
>
> I still don't understand. Lists are not the only data types that can
> be diff'ed.
>
> > The output of
> > 'describe-face' also seems not to have alternatives to enable/disable
> inheritance, not that it helps with
> > programmatic comparisons.
>
> If the 'inherit' attribute is non-nil, describe-face shows a link to
> the inherited face, and you can follow it.
>

Yes, I understand.  I prefer to examine these using *scratch* and/or
programs vs. using the interactive customize-style UI.  face-attribute
already takes inherit, and it seems like a natural extension for
face-all-attributes to be in harmony, and with additional programmer
utility.