>Mon 14 Apr 2025 at 10:07, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Oleg, > > thanks for looking at the license, that is always an important step in > package submission and acceptance. > > Am Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 09:48:28PM +0100 schrieb Sharlatan Hellseher: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Copyright (c) 2025, The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior >> University, through SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (subject to receipt >> of any required approvals from the U.S. Dept. of Energy). All rights reserved. >> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> > > The license given there is essentially the bsd-3 license: > https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD-3-Clause > with "the author" replaced by the actual name of the copyright holder. > > So it is fine to add the package to Guix; I think we use the > (define* (non-copyleft uri #:optional (comment "")) > "Return a lax, permissive, non-copyleft license (for example a variant of > the 3-clause BSD license or the Expat license), whose full text can be found > at URI, which may be a file:// URI pointing the package's tree." > (license "non-copyleft" > uri > (string-append > "This is a lax, non-copyleft free software license. " > "Check the URI for details. " > comment))) > form of the license in this case, for "a variant of the 3-clause BSD > license". > > Andreas Thanks for noticing about the license. I just sent a v2 to fix it.