On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 11:34 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Ship Mints > > Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 09:44:31 -0400 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 77496@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > That's good to hear. None the less, GNUstep is too seldom used for > > feature availability there to justify implementing the same features on > > Mac OS, particularly when Emacs's GNUstep port is known to be unreliable > > and short of other critical editing features such as Indic or Arabic > > script shaping support. > > > > Eli asked that the hurdle to be cleared was support of the same feature > on a free platform. If that hurdle is > > based on platform popularity, what are the precise metrics we should use > to gauge such? I'm aware of > > GNUstep being actively used in military, aerospace, and industrial > products. Is Haiku? Or any other esoteric > > platforms that Emacs supports? > > I said explicitly that this should be supported on X or GTK. I don't > think GNUstep on Linux counts, sorry. It's too niche a platform for > this purpose. > Fair enough. I'll keep looking around for pointers and will see if I can make the dbus shell count/count-visible method work.