Andy Tai writes: > OK, the nano maintainer did not put the source tar gz file at the > usual location at first. I did send him email. Maybe he add it later. > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:35 AM Andreas Enge wrote: >> >> Hello Andy, >> >> your patch has passed QA. However, there is no reason to change the source >> location, even more so since it is a GNU package. So I have done a >> ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u nano >> on my end and pushed the resulting patch (this also verifies the gnupg >> signature, and shows the same hash as you give). >> >> Andreas >> Hi, after updating this version, the cross compilation fails. Can you take a look?