Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez >> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:37:04 -0600 >> When Emacs was compiled with compress-install, using submit-emacs-patch gives an error because it >> search for maintainer address in file.el instead file.el.gz. > Thanks, but this lacks details, IMO. AFAIU, submit-emacs-patch gleans > source file names from the patch file you are about to submit, and it > expands each file name in the patch against source-directory, before > looking them up for their maintainers. In the source tree (if you > still have it around) the files are not compressed. OTOH, if your > patch names files by their absolute file name (in which case > source-directory is not used), and the files are compressed in the > installation tree, then how did you produce the patch from compressed > files in the first place in a way that names the files without the .gz > extensions? My emacs-git directory (where i use to contribute) doesn't have the lisp files compressed, it seems that submit-emacs-patch search in source-directory (which i have it pointing to /usr/share/emacs/31.0.50/) for lisp.el, however my installed emacs was built with compress-install which i have lisp.el.gz instead. > IOW, please show an example of a patch that could be used to reproduce > this issue and the recipe to reproduce, Sure, here is: Steps to reproduce: 1. emacs -Q 2. eval: (setq source-directory "/usr/share/emacs/31.0.50/") 3. M-x submit-emacs-patch RET /path/to/test.patch RET RET and should display mail/message buffer with this #+begin_example To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: From: X-Debbugs-Cc: --text follows this line-- #+end_example and give an error: #+begin_example Opening input file: The file or directory does not exist, /usr/share/emacs/31.0.50/lisp/simple.el #+end_example > and please tell whether you do or don't have the Emacs source tree > pointed to by source-directory. I have source-directory pointing to /usr/share/emacs/31.0.50/, changing it to my emacs-git directory path fix this. However I haven't found any documentation about this variable and changing its value, so I see it very dangerous do it. > Or maybe I'm missing something obvious, in which case please point out > what I missed. You didn't miss anything, I think I've explained enough.