Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: [..] >>> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi >>> index d109877a32..f35e156376 100644 >>> --- a/doc/guix.texi >>> +++ b/doc/guix.texi >>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ >>> Copyright @copyright{} 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 Efraim Flashner@* >>> Copyright @copyright{} 2016 John Darrington@* >>> Copyright @copyright{} 2016, 2017 Nikita Gillmann@* >>> -Copyright @copyright{} 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen@* >>> +Copyright @copyright{} 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen@* >> >> Maybe use 2016-2025 :-). > > Hmm. I thought you needed to have a special exception in the README to > be able for that to hold up in court. I've been postponing to look into > this mess (I used to be too heavily into copyright in my LilyPond years). > However, it seems today is the day :) > > From > > You can use a range (‘2008-2010’) instead of listing individual years > (‘2008, 2009, 2010’) if and only if: 1) every year in the range, > inclusive, really is a “copyrightable” year that would be listed > individually; and 2) you make an explicit statement in a README file > about this usage. > > Sadly, the manual does not seem to give a template to use for this, and > I have learnt to stay away from authoring legal texts. I just asked > gnu-prog-discuss about this. > > I cannot find such a statement in the Guix README? Ludo'? Emacs uses --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- In copyright notices where the copyright holder is the Free Software Foundation, then where a range of years appears, this is an inclusive range that applies to every year in the range. For example: 2005-2008 represents the years 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- so I propose the attached patch. WDYT? Greetings, Janneke