Ian Eure writes: > Is there an upstream source repo? If it’s reasonable to do so, > it’s preferable to use that rather than M/ELPA URLs. Sean seems to be maintaining it directly in the NonGNU ELPA repo: I took a look at other packages from NonGNU ELPA in emacs-xyz and they all seem to use the generated tarballs, so I followed suit here. I think using the ELPA tarball means ‘guix refresh’ will work, which seems noteworthy. I know upstream Git repos are preferable to MELPA, but I think deploying to ELPA and NonGNU ELPA is more intentional on the upstream maintainer’s part (focused on tagged releases). > Everything else looks good to me. Good to hear, thanks for reviewing! —Liam