Maybe "Command for:" vs "Command in:" since the context project and not a directory--directory is an implementation detail, and project-external-roots make the concept of a single directory ambiguous? Go for it. We can always change it later. On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:49 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 17/02/2025 10:47, Ship Mints wrote: > > Perhaps "invoke" instead of "execute" which sounds more natural for > > commands, functions, keys sequences? > > Logically it makes sense, but could this term be too specialized? > > Having tried it in a prompt, it doesn't seem obvious enough. But then > again, maybe it's just a matter of getting used. I don't have a strong > opinion. >