On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 9:56 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:

> On 05/03/2025 20:51, Ship Mints wrote:
> > Right.  We did discuss this a bit back then.  Which of these two less
> > heavy-handed approaches do you prefer?  Setting the property to nil or
> > removing it?
>
> Removing it, I guess. But the function should still be accessed through
> an indirection, so it should be called project-vc-* as it's specific to
> project-vc.
>

Agree. Done in the attached patch.

-Stephane