Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Please let me know what you think of my most recent patch.  If you want
>> something different, may I ask that you send a patch?  I don't think
>> I understand if your idea is different from what I posted.  Thanks.
>
> Your patch still uses _mps_RES_ENUM, which is a macro that's not
> supposed to be used outside of MPS.  Isn't that so?  I thought all
> this discussion was how to avoid using that macro, wasn't it?

AFAIU, the patch I proposed removes that macro.  I just now grepped for
_mps_RES_ENUM after applying it, and couldn't find any matches in my
tree.  Are you seeing something different?

To simplify the review, I've attached the patch with a proper commit
message below.  Thanks.