On 2/1/25 13:06, Jostein Kjønigsen wrote:
> I don’t remember exactly why things ended up the way they did to be honest.
>
> I tried tweaking around with the rules to see if I could get better results, but ended up with different kinds of regressions.

I had time for a little effort. :)

Attached is a pretty minimal patch which seems to work for me. I've 
guarded the changes behind a grammar-check, but I must admit I'm not 
sure if that is needed or not.

Basically I remove the override, and add more specific rules for the 
parts which goes "missing" without it.

Anyone have any opinions on the form of patch? Anyone want to do any 
additional testing?

Let me know! If not, I guess Eli you can install this at your own leisure.

--
Jostein