Hi, Fixed in v4. P.S. Sorry 75862, 75863, 75864 and 75865 was my bad due to missing headers. But 75866, 75867, 75868 and 75869 should not happen. 75270@debbugs.gnu.org was included in CC. WHat do you suggest to do with them? -- Thanks in advance, muradm Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > muradm skribis: > >> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" >> writes: >> >>>> -@item @code{sway-configuration} (default: #f) >>>> -File-like object providing an additional Sway configuration >>>> file >>>> to be >>>> -prepended to the mandatory part of the configuration. >>>> +@item @code{sway-config} (default: @code{(plain-file >>>> "greetd-wlgreet-sway-config" "")}) >>>> +Extra configuration for sway to be included before executing >>>> greeter. >>> >>> Could you retain the name of the existing field >>> sway-configuration? >>> Using abbreviations is uncommon in Guix, I think, >>> [...] >>> Also sway-configuration is used in many examples in the Guix >>> manual. >> >> I'm not sure if it is so strict, there are a lot of places >> where >> 'config' is used. Is there a guideline for naming? > > It is rather strict, yes. The guideline here would be: > > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Formatting-Code.html > > Specifically Riastradh's Lisp Style Rules. > > As for changing the name of configuration fields: this is > something to > avoid because it breaks user configurations. See the guidelines > under > “Services” at: > > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Deprecation-Policy.html > > HTH! > > Ludo’.