Hello, I just send another patch for the news entry to this bug number. Could someone please review it? Thanks, Roman Roman Scherer writes: > Hi Ludo, and everyone still listening, > > thanks for merging it and your help on this! I plan to submit a news > entry patch tomorrow. > > I don't have the time for a blog post unfortunatly. Too busy with other > things at the moment, sorry. :/ Maybe another time. > > Another feedback I wanted to mention. We should really aim to improve on > substitute availability and stability of Guix if we want people to rely > on Guix and `guix deploy`. I think this was also mentioned in the > survey. > > While working on this the user experience of guix deploy really > shined/falled, depending on substitute availability and stability. I'm > probably biased and having bad luck with aarch-64 based Guix systems. > > For example, using the ARM based servers (which are cheaper than x86) > with Guix on Hetzner can lead to a headache if you or the the servers > you deploy to start building Rust and friends. :/ > > I think we get there, thanks again, and happy hacking! > > Roman > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hello Roman, >> >> Applied with the one-line change below. >> >> I wasn’t able to run tests that require an API token because I don’t >> have one (but I may well give that a try eventually); other tests went >> well. >> >> Feel free to submit an entry for ‘etc/news.scm’ (make sure to provide >> enough context so users can tell whether this is something of interest >> to them). A blog post for guix.gnu.org/blog showing how you use it and >> how it’s implemented would also be welcome if you feel so inclined! >> >> Thanks for all the work! >> >> Ludo’.