Stefan Monnier writes: >>> AFAICT, it's easy to make `completion-list-candidate-at-point` accept an >>> optional position argument (which would default to point), which would >>> be helpful in the two places where we use that function. >>> WDYT? >> Indeed. Updated patch attached. > > LGTM, if there are no objections, I'll install it into `master` in > a few days. Thanks. I've attached the latest version of the patch, where the function is simplified without save-excursion. Daniel