-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: bug#73500: eglot: diagnostic location not always shown Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:16:53 +0200 From: Federico Beffa To: João Távora On 30/09/2024 11:41, João Távora wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:19 AM Federico Beffa > wrote: >> A few questions: >> * have you checked the provided lsp*.log files which show that the diagnostics is sent? > Yes. But I don't get that log, as I already showed. >> * have you checked the provided screenshots showing an exclamation mark in the fringe but no underlining? > These are not from emacs -Q so I ignored them. For all I know you may have a > (imaginary-bugs) in your init file. Or have a different setting of the > underlining face > to something that can't be rendered. > > A screenshot of a clean Emacs -Q would have been slightly more useful (well > not really useful, but more interesting at least). They are, I just enabled manually in the session the wombat theme because I prefer dark ones. >> * How do you explain the exclamation mark in the fringe which doess not appear if eglot is not enabled? > That's an odd question. I don't, of course. Much as I can't "explain" > that grainy > footage that someone says they took of bigfoot. Maybe bigfoot exists, maybe > it's just a far away hunchback person. I'll have a better change of > "explaining" something once I can investigate it myself, and so far > I haven't been able to reproduce your sighting. > >> * Do you also see the exclamation mark in the fringe on the line in question? > No, when I tried your Emacs -Q recipe I didn't see any diagnostics. I > thought I > explained that. > >> * Does "cabal run" works? Do you see the output? If not please provide the complete error message. > Eglot doesn't interact with cabal, it interacts via LSP with > haskell-language-server. Nobody said that eglot interacts with cabal. It's the `haskell-language-server` that does...  and, as I told several times, without cabal you don't get any warning and hence the diagnostics. > I can tell you I managed a successful interaction where the server in question > connected perfectly and analized the Main.hs program you provided. When > Tweaking the program, I got some diagnostics. As far as I'm concerned > witnessed first hand in an Emacs -Q session, Eglot correctly underlines all > diagnostics coming from that server, which is not suprising to me, since > they look a lot like any other diagnostic coming from any other server and > Eglot doesn't care about the provenance of diagnostics. > > Also, I uninstalled everything haskell, it bloated up my system and I don't plan > on installing it again.. > > João From all your previous replies I expected these answers. Dismissing bug reports without making any serious effort to reproduce them just makes a disservice to your own and to the Emacs projects. Never mind, I wanted to help the project, but I'll move on to other less buggy and more feature reach options.