On Tue Oct 1, 2024 at 4:26 PM CEST, Greg Hogan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 8:47 PM Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via > wrote: > > > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (git-minimal): Update to 2.46.1. > > (git)[arguments]: Update hash. > > > > Change-Id: I667da2d99478c073aed60ab995d86220fd860050 > > --- > > gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 7 ++++--- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm > > index 3bec28c4f7..c0dc623678 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm > > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ > > ;;; Copyright © 2024 Suhail Singh > > ;;; Copyright © 2024 Simon Tournier > > ;;; Copyright © 2024 Javier Olaechea > > +;;; Copyright © 2024 Ashish SHUKLA > > ;;; > > ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. > > ;;; > > @@ -250,14 +251,14 @@ (define git-cross-configure-flags > > (define-public git-minimal > > (package > > (name "git-minimal") > > - (version "2.46.0") > > + (version "2.46.1") > > (source (origin > > (method url-fetch) > > (uri (string-append "mirror://kernel.org/software/scm/git/git-" > > version ".tar.xz")) > > (sha256 > > (base32 > > - "15bzq9m6c033qiz5q5gw1nqw4m452vvqax30wbms6z4bl9i384kz")))) > > + "0hzmy1vhiz2w34bjdb633pw8ic0fhnl4100npjzcpd3apnwaz348")))) > > (build-system gnu-build-system) > > (arguments > > (list > > @@ -702,7 +703,7 @@ (define-public git > > ".tar.xz")) > > (sha256 > > (base32 > > - "1lvvhzypllbyd8j6m0p9qgd3gqg10gch9s7lqif8vr9n80fqn4fw")))))))))))) > > + "0smz24yfdpczr2p03b4d6v3fn93g19gv9z8s0v4fjdx7w2xf8liw")))))))))))) > > (native-inputs > > (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs git-minimal) > > ;; For subtree documentation. > > > > base-commit: 8dae6b47542b906682f83b06b0478fcbd0776fd6 > > -- > > 2.46.1 > > Would it be better to skip 2.46.1 given the release note for 2.46.2? > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/2.46.2.txt > > "It also reverts the "git patch-id" change that went into 2.46.1, as > it seems to have got a regression reported (I haven't verified, but it > is better to keep a known breakage than adding an unintended > regression)." Thanks for pointing about this. I just sent an updated patch. -- Ashish