On 2024-12-13, Herman Rimm wrote: > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm b/gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm > index b91ff00e28..4516e343b2 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm > @@ -763,7 +764,8 @@ (define u-boot > "u-boot-rockchip-inno-usb.patch")))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > (native-inputs > - (list bison > + (list bc > + bison > dtc > gnutls > flex ... > +(define-public u-boot-tinker-s-rk3288 > + (let ((base (make-u-boot-package "tinker-s-rk3288" "arm-linux-gnueabihf"))) > + (package > + (inherit base) > + (arguments > + (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base) > + ((#:phases phases) > + #~(modify-phases #$phases > + (add-after 'unpack 'set-environment > + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) > + ;; ARMv7 does not have the BL31 stage. > + (setenv "BL32" (search-input-file inputs "/bl32.elf")))))))) > + (inputs > + (modify-inputs (package-inputs base) > + (append arm-trusted-firmware-rk3288)))))) Since you are already modifying the inputs, could "bc" be added here instead as a native-input that just affects u-boot-tinker-s-rk3288? > diff --git a/gnu/packages/firmware.scm b/gnu/packages/firmware.scm > index d89b136c86..670cef5a02 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/firmware.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/firmware.scm > @@ -1171,6 +1171,12 @@ (define-public arm-trusted-firmware-sun50i-a64 > (define-public arm-trusted-firmware-sun50i-h616 > (make-arm-trusted-firmware "sun50i_h616")) > > +(define-public arm-trusted-firmware-rk3288 > + (make-arm-trusted-firmware "rk3288" #:triplet "arm-linux-gnueabihf" > + #:make-flags '("ARCH=aarch32" > + "AARCH32_SP=sp_min" > + "DEBUG=1"))) > + Is AARCH32_SP=sp_min likely to be shared by other rk3288 variants, or should there be multiple arm-trusted-firmware-rk3288 variants for each special option? live well, vagrant