On 18/08/2024 11:15 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[...]> I think you understood the issue, and just creating a new buffer if
> the "normal" one is "taken" should be good enough.  I don't expect
> this situation to be a frequent one, so creating too many buffers
> should not be a danger.

Thanks!  Please, find attached a revised V01 patch that implements
your suggestion.  I finally opted to keep only one function,
because setting a few buffer-local variables on each call has not a
significant impact on performance.