On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:32 PM Juri Linkov wrote: > > > > WIP patch attached with a test and some few > refinements > > we've > > > talked about > > > > in this dialog. I didn't alter tab-bar-mode to > > tab-bar-lines as > > > Martin > > > > suggested. You're the expert. > > > > > > We don't need a new unusable option, so please remove > it > > and submit > > > a new patch. > > > Also please replace tab-bar-mode with tab-bar-lines > like > > Martin > > > suggested. > > > Then everything should be good. Also it seems you > forgot > > to remove > > > window-dedicated-p in your previous patch. > > > > > > I'll work on that now. I'll remove > > > 'window-delete-active-tabs-inhibit-delete-frame'. > > 'window-dedicated-p' > > > condition now gone. > > > > > > Are you sure you don't want this to support the case where > > tab-bar-mode > > > is active and tabs merely aren't visible? > > > > > > There's also 'tab-bar--tab-bar-lines-for-frame' if you think > > that's more > > > appropriate. > > > > 'tab-bar--tab-bar-lines-for-frame' is used to set tab-bar-lines, > > but you need only to get it. > > > > > All tests pass unless I set tab-bar-show nil, and I still think > > this patch > > > should work even if the tab-bar is hidden, but tab-bar-mode is > > enabled. > > > > It's a different situation when you see tabs like in a web > browser. > > They have even an option "Ask before closing multiple tabs". > > We could add a similar option instead of the above one, > > with 3 possible values like > > > > 1. nil - don't ask and close all tabs > > 2. t - close only the current tab > > 3. 'ask - ask a confirmation > > > > Hmm. Well Emacs isn't a web browser, but I hear you. I'll try out > an > > option like that and see how it feels. I haven't looked deeply, but > if > > we prompt inside window functions and there are state changes along > the > > code path before the prompt that we can't undo if the user quits > while > > prompted, I don't think we need that level of complexity. Maybe we > can > > prompt before state changes using window-deletable-p output as an > > indication. Again, not looked that deeply yet. > > > > As I guessed, it's not easy to find the right place(s) to put a prompt > > before state changed or undoing state is easy. May I suggest that we > move > > ahead with the patch I've attached and consider enhancements that may > > include a prompt at a later time? We can also see how people get on with > > the tab-bar-lines condition vs. just tab-bar-mode (which I still prefer)? > > Sorry, this was fixed yesterday following Martin's request in bug#59862. > I've cc-ed you a mail about this, but maybe you missed it? > Could you please update your patch from current master? > Aha that was a different bug number so it wasn't immediately apparent it was the same. It seems, then, that all I need is to submit a patch to amend tab-bar-tests.el with the one that represents the use case we've been discussing? If so, it's attached. -Stephane