Juri Linkov writes: >> What I see and is wrong IMO is: >> >> - DEFAULT is the timestamp of the current file at point and prompt says >> that DEFAULT is "now". >> >> - Pressing RET should use DEFAULT, but IIUC what you say, it returns >> current-time timestamp, is it correct? >> If so this is another inconsistency, RET should always return DEFAULT with an >> empty prompt. > > The prompt of dired-do-touch with the default value "now" is a special case. > This exception is required to solve the time paradox. If the default value > was a fixed value of some moment of time such as you proposed > > (format-time-string "%Y%m%d%H%M.%S" (current-time)) > > then after you press RET the timestamp of the file will be set > to some moment of time in the past, because it takes time > between you press 'T' (dired-do-touch) and then press 'RET' > (exit-minibuffer). > > So the timestamp of the file will be wrong, not the time > when you press 'RET'. For example, I often use the moment > of pressing 'RET' to ensure that the time of pressing 'RET' > is the time that the file timestamp will be set to. The timestamp will be set to a few milliseconds in the past, yes, but is this really a problem? If it is you should fix this in a different way because having a DEFAULT argument which is different of what you have when you press RET is a real issue: As a third party completion package maintainer, how do I know when a completing-read use "foo" as default that when the user press RET he will endup with "bar" ? -- Thierry