Christopher Baines writes: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > >> I submitted a bunch of patches to mesa-updates a few days ago. From >> what I can tell things have gone well on x86_64, with most of the >> "new" failures listed are compared to previous mesa-updates and are >> ones broken on master too. A few failed from some time issue on hydra >> 128. And a few were legitimate failures which I have fixed. I'll go >> through again and make sure I didn't miss anything. I've been using >> this branch locally for a few things without issues so far. >> >> So...I'm guessing the main thing is to wait for non-x86 coverage. Is >> there a way to see that on Bordeaux? As always, please report any >> issues, but hopefully this will be good to go once builds are done. > > The page on QA should show substitute availability [1]. It's probably > going to take a week, probably closer to two to get to a reasonable > level. Substitute availability is getting there, it's just i686-linux which is lagging behind (which is expected with the limited compute resources available). I've just pushed a merge commit to keep the branch up to date with master.