Does it make more sense to either replace this package with the ELPA poke package, or to deprecate this package and have it point back at poke? On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 06:47:08PM +0100, Bruno Victal wrote: > This naming conflicts with the ELPA 'poke' package, a emacs interface to > GNU poke. > > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (emacs-poke): Remove variable. > --- > gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 18 ------------------ > 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/engineering.scm b/gnu/packages/engineering.scm > index 112417b30e..a00c098f90 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/engineering.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/engineering.scm > @@ -3271,24 +3271,6 @@ (define-public poke > data structures and to operate on them.") > (license license:gpl3+))) > > -(define-public emacs-poke > - (package > - (inherit poke) > - (name "emacs-poke") > - (build-system emacs-build-system) > - (arguments > - (list > - #:phases > - #~(modify-phases %standard-phases > - (add-before 'expand-load-path 'change-working-directory > - (lambda _ (chdir "etc")))))) > - (inputs '()) > - (native-inputs '()) > - (synopsis "GNU Poke major modes for Emacs") > - (description > - "This package provides two Emacs major modes for working with GNU Poke: > -@code{Poke Ras mode} and @code{Poke Map mode}."))) > - > (define-public pcb2gcode > (package > (name "pcb2gcode") > -- > 2.41.0 > > > > -- Efraim Flashner רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted