Eli Zaretskii writes: Yup. Here it is. By the way, is there any information on debugging or stepping through the display engine? lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el (gdb-split-io-flag): Don’t create IO ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ buffer if `gdb-split-io-flag’. (gdb-split-io-flag): New user option. — lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el | 14 +++++++++++— 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff –git a/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el b/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el index 42c1c715c73..8ce5df6e0c7 100644 — a/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/gdb-mi.el @@ -1098,9 +1098,10 @@ gdb-init-1 (if gdb-debuginfod-enable “on” “off”)) ’gdb-debuginfod-message) • (gdb-get-buffer-create ’gdb-inferior-io) • (gdb-clear-inferior-io) • (gdb-inferior-io–init-proc (get-process “gdb-inferior”)) ⁃ (when gdb-display-io-buffer ⁃ (gdb-get-buffer-create ’gdb-inferior-io) ⁃ (gdb-clear-inferior-io) ⁃ (gdb-inferior-io–init-proc (get-process “gdb-inferior”))) (when (eq system-type ’windows-nt) ;; Don’t create a separate console window for the debuggee. @@ -1828,6 +1829,13 @@ gdb-display-io-nopopup :group ’gdb :version “25.1”) +(defcustom gdb-display-io-buffer t ⁃ “When non-nil, display the `gdb-inferior-io’ buffer. Otherwise, +send program output to the GDB buffer.“ ⁃ :type ’boolean ⁃ :group ’gdb ⁃ :version “30.1”) ⁃ (defun gdb-inferior-filter (proc string) (unless (string-equal string “”) (let (buf) – 2.42.0 > Ping! Did you have time to produce an updated patch incorporating all > the review comments? If so, please post it. I’d like to install this > change when it is ready. > > Thanks. > >> Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 65007@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 11:01:44 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >> > Cc: 65007@debbugs.gnu.org >> > From: StrawberryTea >> > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:37:06 -0400 >> > >> > I’m not sure whether I should reply or always send the edited patch in as a separate email and have been emailing several times but no longer getting responses. I made the changes you requested: >> >> It is best to send an updated patch, yes. That will make the job of >> installing the changes easier and less error-prone. >> >> Don’t worry about the responses, your messages are being received and >> taken care of, and the changes will be installed once there are no >> more review comments. >> >> Thank you for working on this problem. >> >> >> >>