Hi Maxim,

> Would wrap-script instead of wrap-program work here (I think it does for
> Python and other interpreted languages)? This tends to produce cleaner
> --help message, when $0 (arg0) is used in these, and it looks better in
> 'top' since there's only one script and not a .mygnuhealth-real wrapped
> one.

I've changed the `wrap-program` to `wrap-script` but it fails to run:

$ $ /gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/mygnuhealth
/gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/mygnuhealth: /gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/.mygnuhealth-real: #f: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
/gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/mygnuhealth: line 3: /gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/.mygnuhealth-real: Success

$ head /gnu/store/zxv1d25inf2iyc9bl5lf2wkrm951mvll-mygnuhealth-1.0.5/bin/.mygnuhealth-real
#!#f --no-auto-compile
#!#; Guix wrapper

Haven't used the `wrap-script` before but here it puts completely wrong shebang.

Seems this behavior has been already reported but not resolved. [1]

Patch V3 changes:

* added `bash-minimal` and `python` as dependencies.

1 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/40039

----
Petr